[Wikipedia-l] Death to the comma count!

[Tomos at Wikipedia]

I posted some explanations on the matter in Japanese village pump and 
solicited opinions for those who prefer communicating in Japanese.

Here is an input from Gombe, (as I understood).

Gombe thinks that while it's a little disappointing that article count 
doesn't really increase, counting comma is not totally unacceptable because 
the main focus of the project is elsewhere anyway.

As an alternative, Gombe suggested counting more-than-two-paragraph could be 
good.

----
By the way, for those who are interested, Japanese wikipedia is like this 
right now:

3762 pages
296 counted as articles
distribution of file-sizes in article namespace
7 = 0 bytes
127 < 50bytes
270 < 100bytes
812 < 200
1132 < 300

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail