[Wikipedia-l] Copyright violated in Talks

[Menchi Zh-En WP]

Some people consistently move passages (usually the entire article) of 
copyright violations to Talk pages. Talks may not necessarily be considered 
Wikipedia proper. But they are still integral part of Wikipedia operations 
nevertheless.

This such behaviour acceptable?

I think such people think the violated passage is still useful information 
that can be consulted later. But I mean, if you want to see the violation, 
go check out the history, or if the warning still presents, the source 
website.

Or is Talks actually legally not a part of Wikipedia and so we are not 
responsible if there's unlawful matters or craps on it?

Menchi Zh-En

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail