[Wikipedia-l] Our officially anonymous software

Neil Harris usenet at tonal.clara.co.uk
Fri Sep 20 21:59:26 UTC 2002


Toby Bartels wrote:

>Stephen Gilbert wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Fellow Wikipedians, I want to say that I am thoroughly
>>pleased with the current Wikipedia software. It is
>>stable, speedy and useful. I think it's time we gave
>>it a name other than "the Phase III software".
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>I like the name "PhaseIII Wiki". It is in keeping with
>>Wikipedia history, and people won't have to get used
>>to a completely new name.
>>    
>>
>
>I don't think that it's reasonable
>to have a name that says "Wiki" but not "Pedia".
>We are not the only Wiki around, nor the original,
>and I don't relish the prospect of one day, when we're famous,
>explaining to people that "Wiki" does not mean just Wikipedia
>(as I now have to explain that the "Internet" isn't just the Web).
>
>My vote is for "PediaWiki".  We now have "PediaWiki version 3".
>("3" as in "3.0", except that we're far beyond just 3.0 by now.)
>
>
>-- Toby
>[Wikipedia-l]
>To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
>http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
>  
>
I vote for "Phase III Wikipedia software" which is
* a good name,
* what it is currently being called, and
* self-descriptive

Neil








More information about the Wikipedia-l mailing list