[Wikipedia-l] The groundrules for a discussion with Helga
Jimmy Wales
jwales at bomis.com
Tue Sep 3 17:18:38 UTC 2002
I agree with Gareth. However, and I'm sure he'll agree with me in
return, this does not mean that we should suppress information. There
should be articles _about_ the alternative points of view, _as_
alternative points of view. And I think that's all that Ray meant as
well.
Gareth Owen wrote:
> Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> writes:
>
> > Expressing and supporting a majoritarian point of view should still leave
> > room for alternative points of view, even when the majority considers them
> > quite goofy
>
> I'm sorry, but suggesting that World War II was started by a Jewish conspiracy
> is not "goofy". It is deeply offensive to the memories of the victims of
> Naziism, and entirely at odds with the facts.
>
> I, for one, will have nothing to do with any project that, implicitly or
> explicitly, grants credibility to such a viewpoint. To do so would not be
> neutrality, but an abrogation of moral, intellectual and human responsibility
> to record and report accurately on those events.
> --
> Gareth Owen
>
> [Wikipedia-l]
> To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
> http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list