[Wikipedia-l] Proposals

[tarquin]

Larry Sanger wrote:

>On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, tarquin wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I suggest that such a safe haven be non-editable: a presentation of the
>>best of Wikipedia, not a forking.
>>    
>>
>
>It is disingenuous to call the proposal of expert guidance of a revived
>Nupedia a "fork."  But, if due to your hostility to the idea you want to
>call it one, that's your prerogative.
>  
>
Having two versions of one article, both editable, is a fork by 
definition -- just as Karl Juhnge says.

Will this whole "Cream of Wikipedia" idea actually attract the experts 
we feel we need?