[Wikipedia-l] Survey replies
Larry Sanger
lsanger at seeatown.com
Tue Nov 12 03:41:18 UTC 2002
I'd better report on two private replies I received to my survey.
Further replies to my survey should go to the list. Here were the two
replies.
First reply:
Issue 1: Yes, it is a serious problem and it exists.
Issue 2: The Moderators Option
Second reply:
>ISSUE 1. The problem or lack thereof.
I don't agree with either your pro or your con. Yes, there is a
problem, yes people can often be guided not to be a problem, yes it's
happened before, no it's not happening now (and I'm part of the
problem in that regard, b/c I've not been active on the pedia lately
and would have made considerable strides towards calming e.g. Lir if
at all possible).
>ISSUE 2. What to do about the problem, if anything.
>The Status Quo, Plus Clearer Principles Option: We need to debate and
>settle upon some clear principles about when sanctions are to be meted out
>by our sysops.
yes. we do. I think we've grown past the point where community norms
are obvious, and the more we grow the less obvious they will be (and
the less normative also).
The only consensus I see developing is the need for more clearly stated
community standards. I certainly agree with that myself.
Larry
--
"We have now sunk to a depth at which the re-statement of the obvious is
the first duty of intelligent men." --George Orwell
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list