[Wikipedia-l] Apology

[Jimmy Wales]

Gareth Owen wrote:
> Or, indeed, beyond.  Which is why you don't (or at least *shouldn't*) roll out
> new code into production use without stress testing it.

Good idea!  Are you volunteering to do this for us next time around?

> Can we not have the old one back until the code/hardware can at least perform
> in an acceptable manner?

Since people successfully editing and working, and since the data is now in a
totally different format, rolling back is not really much of an option.

I agree that the site is slow.  It will improve over the next few days.

> PPS:  There is also an old saying that starts:
>         "If it ain't broke..."

There's also an old saying:  "Beggars can't be choosers."

--Jimbo