[Wikimediaindia-l] Insights from GLAMcamp Amsterdam

[Pradeep Mohandas]

hi,

Thank you for your update, Noopur. Coming back with more good and
concrete is great and the best way for the community to reflect.

Personally, I think there are people right now who are focussed on
building a new breed of editors through WikiAcademies and
Wiki-Workshops. This seems to be happening in tech schools and not in
art schools. Very few of the tech school junta might be interested in
the arts or history. But, they can teach the arts school junta to edit
and help them out. I think it is this cross-disciplinary editing that
we need to foster more in the Indian community.
There are people on this mailing list who are interested in
participating in GLAM. I hope they respond to this thread and
participate in the conversation.

warm regards,
Pradeep

On 12/12/2011, Noopur <noopur.raval at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> These are my insights from GLAMcamp Amsterdam. I have put them in form of
> some key questions. For me it was a brilliant learning experience. So, most
> of these answers are not mine, rather they have been generated as
> collaborative responses by various people from different chapters. I am
> grateful to WMF, WM-NL and WM-UK for their special interest in helping
> encourage GLAM participation in India.
> This is the link to the programs:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAMcamp_Amsterdam#Schedule and in each
> session you will find an etherpad link to the live discussion!
>
>
> Why GLAMwiki is becoming all the more important?
>
> Flickr: popular mass upload tool but is no longer available; it has pending
> requests and flickr commons has no money to support more file sharing.
> Wikimedia Commons allows almost the same functions and metadata sharing,
> open licensing with a bonus Wikipedia link (something that institutions go
> by). Since most institutions don’t really know what Wikimedia or commons
> is, the Wikipedia name leverages partnerships and allows them similar
> archiving benefits. For us, it is also outreach.
>
>
> Common questions by GLAM institutions in other countries:
>
>    -
>
>    Why Wikipedia, why not our own website?
>
> Because of the abysmal disparity in web-view. Simply, Wikipedia is the
> 5thmost visited, gives far more visibility in web traffic as compared
> to your
> own website. However, integrating wikis and providing links is not hard
> either. So, it doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive.
>
>    -
>
>    This is complicated, is there an easier way to collaborate?
>
> Advice to GLAM and cultural/outreach people: Carry presentations (PPT),
> simple statistics, don’t go into metrics jargon, show in simple numbers,
> percentage, fractions how people can make a difference or vice versa. Use
> things like color coding, emphasize on the importance and seriousness of
> ‘free knowledge’, larger things that Wikipedia is also in service of. This
> helps people connect at different levels. Most importantly, break your
> hierarchies and trash your rule books (or make simpler ones that use less
> jargon). If you are concerned about quality editing there are two solutions
> (get content specific editathons and organize a Wiki academy EVERY week).
>
>
> What happens once partnership is over? How to sustain?
>
> This is why a GLAM coordinator is not simply a GLAM person. S/he is also
> someone who does massive outreach: Wikipedia takes your city; Wiki loves
> monuments, wikiacademies, PR and network building with local, regional and
> national resource persons outside the community. While in capacity as a
> fellow, the idea is also to do value addition, train employees (at least
> train in minor edits, article making, image uploading). Source one contact
> through another.
>
> (My take: As I see it, there has to be a crucial change in orientation.
> From exhaustive internal debates, discussions and tool building exercises,
> it has to move and adapt to the larger Open and free scene, involving
> people albeit on a temporary basis and expanding. Monopolizing Wikipedia as
> a city, state or indic language space is only going to create a highly
> concentrated yet a very niche community)
>
>    -
>
>    (Question asked to me) 52 cultural partnerships listed on GLAM request
>    page, why not India?
>
> Frankly, I had no answers why. My hunch is that since traditionally science
> and technology oriented courses and vocations have been encouraged, few lay
> people really know their culture or feel as passionately about
> conservation. On the other hand, placement of government officials to
> unrelated departments (museums) included leaves them little motivation to
> go beyond their regular duties. On the other hand, there is also a large
> communication and visibility problem since Wikimeetups aren’t really a
> matter of common knowledge even to journalists. Wikimedia India really
> needs to carve out a place and get involved in academic and art spaces,
> have people just talk about their experiences, present smaller individual
> pilots (Sumanna)
>
>    -
>
>    Why no Indian participation in ‘This month in GLAM’?
>
> Because there is really no ‘Indian’ GLAM or ‘Indian’ community. As
> wonderful as the Indic language efforts are, it would be great if there
> were biannual national meet-ups, regional meets  and more frequent local
> meets. Identify at least 4-5 cities that can act as pivotal regional
> meeting and resource points. This will also help generate smaller goals and
> activities and we can have our own newsletter as well as TMIG updates.
>
>    -
>
>    How do we identify, regulate and strengthen local community based
>    interactions?
>
> Most important: Every chapter must have a national outreach coordinator.
> Have mandatory sections in agenda: Gender gap, Indic, English, GLAM, tools,
> updates, outreach. Invite guest speakers or professors who can give a talk
> or attend and that way get to see the internal workings of the local
> community. Try and concretize a press team, media releases, word of mouth,
> social networking channel so that every time news passes by, we have a
> loyal reader, enthusiast base.
>
>    -
>
>    What tools are used to digitize artifacts?
>
> Proposed GLAMtoolset, more on etherpad, apart from this proposal to move
> GLAM to a different portal from Outreach redirect. More on etherpad
>
>    -
>
>    Do people really know who a Wikipedian is, what Wikimedia projects are
>    about?
>
> Andy Mabbett, Fae from UK chapter spoke about their fund raising and
> outreach activities, also on how to recruit new editors and how to recruit
> new Wikimedians
>
> Important task is to categorically do outreach and editor involvement
> together.
>
>    -
>
>    Who all do you invite in a wikimeetup?
>
> Go to institutions and say how can we help you
>
> Go with groups to cultural institutions and get volunteers so that  you get
> focused group
>
> Organize a fb group and event
>
> Is there a monthly update?
>
> Need for a cultural outreach coordinator position
>
> Need for a monthly newsletter that binds all indic and English community
> members
>
> Need to look at GLAMs more seriously because women’s outreach and GLAM are
> intricately connected.
>
> Need to move to more friendly UIs and keep discussions going. Of course,
> mailing lists exist and they can be for people specifically involved in a
> community but for the novices and to attract more people, there is a need
> to get FB groups going, have more Wiki academies.
>
>
> These are a few salient questions. I will appreciate your suggestions,
> advice, comments and questions. Let us try and be civil about criticism,
> like mature, secure adults :) Look forward to your responses!
>
> Warmly
>
> Noopur
>
> --
> Noopur Raval
> Student
> Arts and Aesthetics
> Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
> Ph: 9650567690
>


-- 
Pradeep Mohandas
How Pradeep uses email - http://goo.gl/6v1I9