Hi,
There isn't such a thing as just one politics, therefore, the subject line
question is really broad.
We are not apolitical about free knowledge, no doubt about that. On the
other hand, we as a movement can be or become apolitical in other political
fields. All this discussion, in my opinion, has to be addressed from the
correct political field that we are standing (or not). Which is the
political field of the question proposed then? (this is just a rhetorical
question.)
In the free knowledge political field, I repeat, we are not apolitical from
the moment we advocate for free knowledge, free content, free licenses,
free software, etc. I also do not wish that we ever become apolitical about
that, even if mistakes are made in the way.
Cheers,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:44 PM Tito Dutta <trulytito(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
It is asked: "are we apolitical?" A spin-off question: "are we
unbiased?"
On Wikipedia, we (are to) provide and serve knowledge/information, not any
particular view(s)
Thanks
Tito Dutta
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 00:34, Chris Gates via Wikimedia-l <
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
Agreed. There is no way to get around the fact
that some people oppose
our
message of free access to our projects for
everyone, and the actions we
make in favor of that goal are often political.
However, there is a very large gap between publicly supporting such
policies as a less regulated internet, copyright advocacy, etc., and
Earth
Day Live's endorsed viewpoint.
If they were solely about Earth Day, we'd have no issues, as the few
people
who oppose Earth Day are probably living in the
mountains somewhere with
a
half dozen solar panels and tinfoil hats to
protect themselves from the
flying saucers surveying the flat earth.
The problem I have with Earth Day Live is that, were the Wikimedia
Foundation to publicly endorse those views, it would inherently be
isolating of people who do not share them. For example, there were many
people on the endorsed streams advocating for all industries to have
unions
and a universal $15 minimum wage. Ignoring the
fact that it's
specifically
American and was shown to everyone globally, I do
not support either of
those policies for various reasons (primarily that much of my work is
done
for under $15/hr, and I would likely lose some of
those jobs), and should
not be forced at odds with the WMF's party line.
If the Foundation begins publicly endorsing certain policies or
viewpoints
that are not directly a part of the mission which
we all agree with and
work towards, people who disagree with those viewpoints would be forced
into opposition of the foundation intended to represent the work they
volunteer for Wikimedia projects. Our intention is to deliver unbiased
information to people, and if the Foundation has a declared political
stance other than our mission statement, it also opens the Foundation to
legitimate criticism on claims of bias.
There is also the argument of timelessness. Two hundred years ago there
was
a very different political landscape with very
different arguments taking
place. Two hundred years from now, provided humanity still exists, would
likely be very different than today. Assuming that the WMF and Wikipedia
will still be around, is it better to attempt to remain out of political
advocacy (with the exception of our mission), or to take distinct
political
stances whenever the political field shifts? I
fall in the former
category.
Best regards,
Chris Gates
(User:Vermont)
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:45 PM Camelia Boban <camelia.boban(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Absolutely agree with both. Everything we do in the wiki movement (as
> everything we do in our whole life) has (also) a political meaning.
> As we have certain goals and we take certain positions.
>
> Camelia
>
> --
> *Camelia Boban*
>
> *| Java EE Developer |*
>
>
>
> *Affiliations Committee - **Wikimedia Foundation*
> Diversity WG for Wikimedia Strategy 2030
> *Interwiki Women
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_Women_Collaboration> |
**Wiki
> Loves Sport
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Sport> | Wiki
> Loves
> Fashion <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Fashion>*
> WMIT <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Italia> - WMSE
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Sverige> - WMAR
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Argentina> - WMCH
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CH> Member
>
> M. +39 3383385545
> camelia.boban(a)gmail.com
> *Aissa Technologies* <http://aissatechnologies.eu/>* | *Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/cameliaboban> *|* *LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/camelia-boban-31319122>*
> *Wikipedia <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Camelia.boban> **|
> **WikiDonne
> UG <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiDonne>* | *WikiDonne Project
> <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:WikiDonne> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno sab 25 apr 2020 alle ore 18:12 Rebecca O'Neill <
> rebeccanineil(a)gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Well said. Everything is political, and when the movement choses not
to
> > speak out or state an opinion on
something, then we are giving our
> support
> > to the status quo.
> >
> > Believing yourself to be apolitical is as much a fantasy as being
> > completely objective, it is inherently impossible.
> >
> > Rebecca
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, 16:50 John Erling Blad, <jeblad(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > > It is said quite often that the Wikimedia-movement is apolitical.
In
> > > strongly believe the movement with
its goal has never been, and
never
>
will
> > be apolitical. When we say that knowledge should be free and fully
> > available for everyone, then we make a political statement. It may
not
> > > align with you favorite love/hate political party, but it is still
a
very
> > strong political statement.
> >
> > So please, don't claim the movement to be apolitical. We may not
align
> with
> > any specific political party in any specific country, but we are
still
> not
> > apolitical.
> >
> > /jeblad
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>