[Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments
Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemowiki at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 22:18:31 UTC 2014
Your inline replying format highly confuses me, but I tried to
reconstruct what you meant to say and I believe it's what below.
Jaime Anstee, 25/01/2014 20:19:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
>> Is "active editor retention" a metric defined somewhere?
>> It's not in <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:WMF_
>> standardized_editor_classes>. [...]
> Yes -
> Thank you for asking, and mentioning that it is not linked in the
> section. I will reference that link there.
I know what an "active editor" is, you'll see in the history that I
contributed to the section you linked. I asked about the "rate of active
editor retention" as Asaf called it, or... "Six-month follow-up Active
second quarter of retention follow-up" (??) as mentioned in the page.
Apart from the confusing terminology, you'll note that it doesn't match
with the (draft?) definition
with non-standard n=1, m=15, t_2=90 days and t_1 < 0 unless you
arbitrarily pose T = end of September. You may want to align definitions
> I would like to point out that
> the overview page to the set of reports does contain a lot of important
> information about how things were defined and are reported in each programs
> evaluation report.
If you mean
it doesn't contain any definition for the metric.
More information about the Wikimedia-l