[Wikimedia-l] [Wikitech-l] Reasonator use in Wikipedias

[Jane Darnell]

Magnus, you are magical as always, thanks!
What an odd list though - who has been working so diligently on
Russian paintresses? Whoever you are, great work!
meanwhile, sending more virtual kudos to Magnus while I dig into these results,
Jane

2014/1/24, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske at googlemail.com>:
> A list of female painters with no article on en.wp:
> http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim%5B106%3A1028181%5D%20and%20claim%5B21%3A6581072%5D%20%20and%20nolink%5Benwiki%5D
>
> (might take a few seconds to load)
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jane Darnell <jane023 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I have been generating
>> some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about
>> Art & Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I
>> could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects.
>> With Reasonator I see 503 female persons and 760 male persons. Not
>> very helpful (yet) for generating red-link lists.
>>
>> 2014/1/23, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com>:
>> > On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske at googlemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box
>> would
>> >> be
>> >> > the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
>> >> > information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have
>> >> > to
>> >> > do
>> >> > is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the
>> >> > wikidata information. In light of that, writing code to fill an
>> infobox
>> >> > with values form wikidata to paste into the article seems ...
>> >> > low-tech
>> >> ;-)
>> >>
>> >> Indeed - but we have to work with what we have.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps we could concentrate on one very narrow subject, and its
>> >> single corresponding infobox, as a pilot?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > I suggest that this discussion should be on the various projects that
>> might
>> > be affected, particularly as different projects have very different
>> > ideas
>> > about whether the use of Wikidata for anything more than language links
>> is
>> > acceptable. Many projects do not permit bulk bot creation of content,
>> > and
>> > this proposal is a close parallel.
>> >
>> > Further, content that isn't editable on the project on which it is
>> > hosted
>> > is probably not a very effective way to persuade people to turn it into
>> an
>> > actual page.
>> >
>> > Trialing the process on some small projects that actively volunteer to
>> > participate would be a first step.
>> >
>> > Risker/Anne
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> > Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> undefined
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>