[Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
When you go the way of comparing to Kim Dotcom to make a point, you will
have to recognise that the government has been shown to act illegally.
Consequently your argument is without real merit.
Thanks,
     GerardM


On 31 December 2013 20:45, ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On 31/12/2013 15:01, Yann Forget wrote:
>
>> 2013/12/31 ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't that the attitude that got Kim Dotcom into trouble?
>>> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/us-unveils-the-
>>> case-against-kim-dotcom-revealing-e-mails-and-financial-data/
>>>
>>
>>
>> This is a typical trolling. Comparing Megaupload with Wikimedia Commons?
>> Don't you have better (constructive) arguments?
>>
>>
> I'm comparing your attitude that rather than fixing the known copyright
> issues upfront one should await complaints before addressing, to be similar
> to that exhibited by megaupload. An attitude that is essentially one of
> "We'll get away with it for as long as possible, until someone complains."
> Meanwhile falsely advertising that the content is free to use.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>