[Wikimedia-l] New access to non-public information policy, re-ID requirements and data retention

Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki at gmail.com
Tue Oct 15 10:25:03 UTC 2013


Keegan Peterzell, 15/10/2013 10:24:
> The two are related. Both measures seek transparency, one to the WMF and
> one to the community.  The fact that the community side has worked is
> interesting when there is pushback to private transparency.

This is an interesting point, thanks for making it. I would never have 
considered the identification via private means something relating to 
"transparency", but it's clear that – as you say – people are more 
likely to accept a transparency which benefits the public.

Nemo



More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list