[Wikimedia-l] New access to non-public information policy, re-ID requirements and data retention
Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemowiki at gmail.com
Tue Oct 15 10:25:03 UTC 2013
Keegan Peterzell, 15/10/2013 10:24:
> The two are related. Both measures seek transparency, one to the WMF and
> one to the community. The fact that the community side has worked is
> interesting when there is pushback to private transparency.
This is an interesting point, thanks for making it. I would never have
considered the identification via private means something relating to
"transparency", but it's clear that – as you say – people are more
likely to accept a transparency which benefits the public.
Nemo
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list