[Wikimedia-l] : WMF resolution on neutral point of view

[とある白い猫]

I have posted 4 sentences, kind of a draft of a draft of a draft.

It is very overwhelming for me to draft text with near-legal precision on
my own.

  -- とある白い猫  (To Aru Shiroi Neko)


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> I'd say "be bold" and start drafting.  Many people respond to a flawed (or
> at least improvable) text more readily than they do to an open invitation
> to contribute.
>
> I, for one, share your perception that NPOV is a problem on some (perhaps
> most) Wikipedias, and think it'd be a good idea to bolster NPOV with a
> Board resolution.  Not because it would instantly solve the problem, of
> course, but I see its value in supporting those editors who'd fight to
> uphold NPOV.
>
>    A.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:26 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Legal_and_Community_Advocacy#Draft_of_text_for_a_binding_Neutral_Point_of_View_WMF_policy
> >
> > I started above text to draft a text for the board to review.
> >
> >   -- とある白い猫  (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:56 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > A talk page on meta wont be noticed by much which is why perhaps this
> is
> > > the better location for the discussion. It is not like I am proposing a
> > > meta policy.
> > >
> > >   -- とある白い猫  (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> >> I am not disputing how settled it is but I don't think meta
> > >> >> sufficiently
> > >> >> achieves expressing how settled this core value really is. As you
> > >> >> stated
> > >> >> it
> > >> >> would be more of a restatement and re-emphasis of what already is a
> > >> >> core
> > >> >> value.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   -- 㠨㠂る白㠄猫  (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
> > >> >
> > >> > Yes, good idea, needs to be done. Please notify the board of
> > >> directors...
> > >> >
> > >> > Fred
> > >>
> > >> That was snippy...
> > >>
> > >> Editing a major meta policy page must be done with considerable
> caution,
> > >> starting by making suggestions on its talk page:
> > >>
> > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neutral_point_of_view
> > >>
> > >> There is some, rather limited, discussion in section 3.
> > >>
> > >> Fred
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > >> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ,
> > >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>     Asaf Bartov
>     Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>
>
> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
> sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
> https://donate.wikimedia.org
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>