[Wikimedia-l] Patience
Anders Wennersten
mail at anderswennersten.se
Wed May 15 07:20:01 UTC 2013
Your comment remind me of my strong belief - take time to reflect before
to take action and/or react
My golden rule in complicated/heated issues - let it take 24 hours
after an urge to act/react before it is made a reality. About two third
of your thought reactions then disappears and the rest is mostly
readjusted to be more sound. :)
Anders
Michael Snow skrev 2013-05-15 08:45:
> I originally wrote this message last year on a nonpublic list. It
> seemed to be well received, and some people asked me to share it
> publicly, but I didn't get around to it then. I think this would be a
> good time to share it here now. It is not specifically directed at
> recent issues here, but I think it does have some relevance. (I have
> some thoughts more directly related to those matters as well, which I
> hope to share when I have time to write them down. That might not
> happen until late Friday, which is probably not the best time for it,
> but based on recent history perhaps I can still hope some people will
> be reading then.)
>
> Internet technology is known for letting things happen much faster
> than they did before we were all so connected. This speed now seems
> normal to us and, being immersed in that culture, we have come to
> expect it. Wikis, as one aspect of that culture, have the feature of
> making that speed a personal tool - you can make something happen
> right away. How many of us got involved because we saw a mistake and
> figuratively couldn't wait to fix it? And when we discovered that we
> literally didn't have to wait, we were hooked.
>
> One result of this is a culture that caters to impatience, sometimes
> even rewards it. And that's why we are often tempted to think that
> being irritable is a way of getting things done. We imagine: this
> problem should be instantly solved, my idea can be implemented right
> away, I will be immediately informed about whatever I care about. But
> as our culture grows in scale, none of that remains true (and perhaps,
> we get more irritated as a result).
>
> I wish I could say that because it's a matter of scale, technology
> will take care of things because that's how we handle scaling.
> However, the issue is not about whether the technology will scale, but
> whether the culture will scale. On a cultural level, scaling issues
> are not handled by technology alone. They are handled by establishing
> shared values (be bold, but also wait for consensus), by agreeing upon
> standard procedures (which provide important protections when designed
> well, but also introduce delays), and by dividing up responsibilities
> (which requires that we trust others).
>
> That last bit is critical; people have repeatedly suggested a certain
> mistrust underlies the repeated flareups. Well, the reason that
> mistrust has grown so much is because we are often impatient, and take
> shortcuts in order to "get things done" (or so we believe). The
> impatience manifests on all sides--to illustrate: volunteers get
> impatient about the effort needed for any kind of policy change,
> chapters get impatient about requirements to develop internal controls
> and share reports on their activities, staff get impatient about time
> involved in consulting with the community. Everyone thinks it would be
> so much better if they were free to just do things and not have to
> deal with these hassles. But in every one of these scenarios, and I'm
> sure I could come up with many more, if we let impatience guide us,
> inevitably more trust will be drained out of the system.
>
> Patience as a virtue is in short supply on the internet. It is not
> native to our culture, but we must apply it in order to scale.
> Fortunately, it is simply a matter of maturity and self-control at
> appropriate moments. I encourage us all to practice it.
>
> --Michael Snow
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list