[Wikimedia-l] UK.Gov passes Instagram Act

[Tom Morris]

There's also this: 

http://www.create.ac.uk/blog/2013/05/06/orphans-much-ado-about-what/ 

-- 
Tom Morris
<http://tommorris.org/>


On Saturday, 4 May 2013 at 16:32, Luis Villa wrote:

> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek at gmail.com (mailto:polimerek at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > 
> > 2013/5/2 David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com (mailto:dgerard at gmail.com)>:
> > > On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao <shizhao at gmail.com (mailto:shizhao at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As usual, Orlowski is trolling for clicks. Here's the actual text:
> > > 
> > > http://niaccurshi.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/orphan-works-enterprise-and-regulatory.html
> > 
> > And The Economist POV:
> > 
> > http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/05/orphan-works
> 
> Another, more considered, piece, from Andres Guadamuz:
> 
> http://www.technollama.co.uk/has-the-uk-abolished-copyright-analysis-of-new-orphan-work-legislation
> 
> 
> --
> Luis Villa
> Deputy General Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
> 415.839.6885 ext. 6810
> 
> NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
> have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about
> the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for
> legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a
> lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their
> personal capacity.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org)
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l