[Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

[Peter Southwood]

That would be very interesting and useful information
Cheers,
Peter (User:Pbsouthwood)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Cuenca" <dacuetu at gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof 
bots)


> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Anders Wennersten 
> <mail at anderswennersten.se
>> wrote:
>
>> The base fact figures for sv:wp is
>> Increase of views +23% on yearly basis, WM:DE +3, WMF:Fr +8 (all mature
>> wikipediauser communities), nl with +14 and wm:it with +16 also very good
>> figures (Spain Russia, and Portugal still in a built up phase have higher
>> numbers) http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/**TablesPageViewsMonthlyCombined**
>> .htm <http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthlyCombined.htm>
>>
>> Editor >1 and >5 somewhat up or stable, new editor up in Jan, Feb, March,
>> but down in April (eastertime)
>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaSV.htm
>
>
> Instead of just discussing this topic as always has been done, it would be
> great to take advantage of the opportunity to monitor changes in the sv-wp
> community as a result of this massive automated article creation.
>
> For me it would be interesting to know:
> 1) current perception in the community about automated articles correlated
> with the number of contributions by the person answering.
> 2) impact of the newly created articles: views, human edits done to those
> articles (specially nr of bytes added), correlation with nr of previous
> edits
> 3) changes in the community after 1 year, survey of new members, of those,
> how many registered after seeing a bot article vs how many after seeing a
> human-created article?
> 4) some metrics about the article quality (maybe with AFT)
>
> Otherwise the same arguments are going to be repeated over and over again,
> year after year, without ever reaching a conclusion, or without ever
> learning which impact those articles might have.
>
> Cheers,
> Micru
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>