[Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk aboutVisualEditor

[Peter Southwood]

It is a fair question.
Peter
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Gerard" <dgerard at gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk 
aboutVisualEditor


> On 31 July 2013 10:59, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
>>> asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
>>> subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
>>> hasn't.)
>
>> Hi David, i am editing on dewp and enwp. I consider myself an experienced
>> editor, but not an expert. I did not participate voting in dewp, but i 
>> like
>> to try ve from time to time. Beeing a software developper I fully support
>> eriks arguments before. Imo pragmatic and flexible decisions help such
>> development a lot, just like Erik explained.
>
>
> Certainly. However, it's the obvious question to ask, and a curious
> question to spend several paragraphs not answering.
>
> Erik, James - how did de:wp convinced you when en:wp hasn't?
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>