[Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

[Risker]

On 31 July 2013 08:36, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 31 July 2013 10:59, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
> >> asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
> >> subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
> >> hasn't.)
>
> > Hi David, i am editing on dewp and enwp. I consider myself an experienced
> > editor, but not an expert. I did not participate voting in dewp, but i
> like
> > to try ve from time to time. Beeing a software developper I fully support
> > eriks arguments before. Imo pragmatic and flexible decisions help such
> > development a lot, just like Erik explained.
>
>
> Certainly. However, it's the obvious question to ask, and a curious
> question to spend several paragraphs not answering.
>
> Erik, James - how did de:wp convinced you when en:wp hasn't?
>
>
>
I would also like to see a direct answer to David's very specific
question.

Risker