[Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor

David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 18:13:45 UTC 2013


On 30 July 2013 17:03, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:

>If the overwhelming community sentiment
> is that the cost of continuous improvement with a large scale user
> base is larger than the benefit (as it was on dewiki), we'll switch
> back (or to a compromise), and use a more rigid set of acceptance
> criteria and a less rigid deadline for getting back into large scale
> usage later in the year.


de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
hasn't.)


- d.



More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list