[Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk about VisualEditor
David Gerard
dgerard at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 18:13:45 UTC 2013
On 30 July 2013 17:03, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>If the overwhelming community sentiment
> is that the cost of continuous improvement with a large scale user
> base is larger than the benefit (as it was on dewiki), we'll switch
> back (or to a compromise), and use a more rigid set of acceptance
> criteria and a less rigid deadline for getting back into large scale
> usage later in the year.
de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
hasn't.)
- d.
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list