[Wikimedia-l] License issue on GPL and CC-by-sa mix up

[Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton]

Ok, I really understand that, but with they those GFDL? What we can do?


On 24 February 2013 06:54, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek em gmail.com> wrote:

> 2013/2/24 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <rodrigo.argenton em gmail.com>:
> > Why We don't change your license in pages that gonna receive this
> content?
> > (I know this is not the best license ever made, but why always the other
> > need to be adapt to us, not the opposite?)
> >
>
> Using GPL license for textual content hardly make any sense... It puts
> users to a kind of uncertainty what he/she really can do with it as
> the license does not contain explanation what is allowed to do with
> content, which is not a piece of software. Open wiki textual content
> has to be uniformly licensed as every edit is from legal POV creation
> of derivative work of previous version.
>
>
> --
> Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
> http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
> http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
> http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l em lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>



-- 
Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argenton em gmail.com
+55 11 979 718 884