[Wikimedia-l] Strange, surprising, bold and unnecessary - reply to the WMF board statement

[Thomas Dalton]

The first draft was rejected - James is talking about Theo's draft.
Was that also explicitly rejected?

On 6 February 2013 23:47, Fae <faewik at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I added "REJECTED" several times to that page yesterday, just to make
> the situation clear. Based on your email, I have now made that word
> big and red so there can be no mistake by anyone when they land on the
> page.
>
> Doing an analysis and lambasting the Chapters Association for a
> concept document that the majority of the Council Members quickly
> rejected, is a bit of a waste of your time. Certainly I have
> absolutely no interest in defending this document, as I was personally
> unconvinced by it (though grateful for the volunteers that worked on it
> in good faith), and spent hardly any time reviewing it when it was
> presented.
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> Ashley Van Haeften (Fae) faewik at gmail.com
> Chapters Association Council Chair http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WCA
> Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l