[Wikimedia-l] Has the underlying level of edits risen or fallen since the Edit Filters came in in 2009?
Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemowiki at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 12:49:12 UTC 2013
The question can't really be answered without knowing what you want to
achieve; I'll start from the end.
WereSpielChequers, 28/08/2013 14:13:
> This is of more than academic interest, if we simply ignore this effect and
> make decisions based on the remaining raw edits after the edit filter, then
> the more efficient the edit filter gets at preventing vandalism the more we
> would be beating ourselves up for losing edits.
Usually we consider the number of active users, which is less affected
by this. Editing activity should be measured using
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/PlotsPngEditHistoryAll.htm which allows to
check for unreverted edits (just updated by Erik after a few years it
had been dormant).
If your aim is measuring the impact AbuseFilter in reducing patrolling
efforts, then it's another matter. I've requested some reports in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42359 : there are already
some DB queries but we lack a visualisation.
You can also use https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abuse_filter to find
what wikis used (or not) the abuse filter and how, before it was enabled
by default on all wikis.
Nemo
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list