[Wikimedia-l] Comments on compliance and the FDC Round 2 decisions

Dariusz Jemielniak darekj at alk.edu.pl
Tue Apr 30 12:53:10 UTC 2013


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com>wrote:

> Moreover, it's well known that the FDC decisions are based also on
> "context" i.e. private information not part of the proposals or discussions
> thereof.
> It's normal for people outside WMF not to understand them fully, and after
> all if the rules were so easy to apply you wouldn't need a "double track"
> decision with FDC+staff with final rubberstamping by the WMF board. It's
> quite obvious that there will always be room for interpretation, or in
> other words what made Jan-Bart «impressed with the level of [...]
> flexibility of the FDC members».


I'm not sure what you mean by that and how/why it is "well known" (it is
not well known to me, we make efforts to make sure that applicants are
treated fairly, equally, and not depending on snippets of some private
information, although naturally depending on the correspondence, dialogue
etc. with the chapter, which to some extent is also not entirely public for
obvious reasons).


Tomasz: as I wrote, it is imperative that a CLEAR and UNDERSTANDABLE
guideline is prepared :)

best,

dj


More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list