[Wikimedia-l] (semi-OT) Open access "catastrophic" for Elsevier
Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemowiki at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 07:33:00 UTC 2012
Tim Starling, 24/09/2012 04:24:
> According to the PDF, each published article costs them 1954 GBP, and
> brings in a revenue of 3256 GBP. A very nice business to be in. They
> already charge the authors a processing fee of 2000 GBP per article,
> so they could break even with open access, without increasing the
> author fee at all. That would be bad for investors, but the company
> would survive. So maybe it's not quite time to dance on Elselvier's grave.
Indeed, this is not really about higher or lower costs and revenues:
it's mainly about a new kind of market and business which Elsevier is
not ready for. Other publishers, like Springer, have been wiser and
experimented a lot with Open Access: not because they are
philanthropists, but to be ready for everything and avoid the risk of
being swept away by history.
emijrp, 24/09/2012 09:08:
> In the wiki-research mailing list we are talking about Open-Access
journals
> and new ways to publish and disseminate research results. A summary is
> available http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas
Thanks. I've asked a question on talk: it's also relevant for this
topic/mailing list if you disagree with my assumption there.
Nemo
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list