[Wikimedia-l] AFT5: what practical benefits has it had?

Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il
Fri Oct 12 09:33:55 UTC 2012

2012/10/12 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com>:
> Dario Taraborelli, 06/09/2012 23:47:
>> The complete reports on WMF research on AFT5 can be found here:
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback
>> The tool is currently deployed on a random 10% sample of English Wikipedia
>> articles so it's not surprising most readers/editors don't see it very
>> often. We are currently collecting about 4K unique feedback messages per
>> day: http://toolserver.org/~dartar/aft5
>> As for the quality of feedback – as judged by community members and
>> readers – we have some preliminary usage data coming from the FeedbackPage:
>> http://toolserver.org/~dartar/fp/ as well as results based on blind
>> assessment by Wikipedians that we ran during the early stages of AFT5
>> research (see the "Quality assessment" sections in the research reports
>> above).
> Graphs are empty for me there, is it just me?

No, for me too. They start being full at "Daily feedback volume
(option 1)". And the graphs on the FeedbackPage usage dashboard are
completely empty.

Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list