[Wikimedia-l] Why the Wikimedia Foundation should openly articulate its political POV by establishing a new neutral wiki for world political knowledge (modeled on Wikipedia)

[Thomas Morton]

>
> As a fictional example, let's suppose some members of Congress propose
> legislation to build a new Brooklyn Bridge. Under the subject: HR 999
> Proposal to build a new Brooklyn Bridge, there would be one pro and one con
> argument edited only by members of Congress and one pro and one con
> argument edited by the general public.


Why would political knowledge need to presented with a POV? That merely
encourages confirmation bias.

Dividing viewpoints into two different strands doesn't sound much like
informing, it sounds rather a lot like providing a platform for soapboxing
:)

Tom