[Foundation-l] Controversial content software status - the image filter disguised under a new label

[Tobias Oelgarte]

Am 13.03.2012 10:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte<
> tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
>>
>>> No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
>> statements. Your assumption is that we have to sacrifice neutrality to
>> please a audience that doesn't want to see that it is looking for... Great
>> start!
>>
>
> Neutrality is following what our sources do.

¹ Depends on:
    * the definition of "sources"
    * the neutrality of the sources itself
    * the context of "do" in respect to "clould do"/"might do"/"supposed 
to do"/...
    * the target audience ("to entertain" vs "to educate" themself)
>
>> All we said was: Every content has to be treated as equal.
>>
>
> That is a fringe position in the real world.

That is the encyclopedic viewpoint of the world. Even so it might not be 
achievable, it is the aim.

nya~ (said the cat leaning at window)