[Foundation-l] Image filter

[David Gerard]

On 10 March 2012 22:15, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk> wrote:

> The image filter may not be a good solution, but too much of the
> response involves saying "we're fine, we're neutral, we don't need to
> do anything" and leaving it there; this isn't the case, and we do need
> to think seriously about these issues without yelling "censorship!"
> any time someone tries to discuss the problem.


There are theoretical objections, and then there are the actual objectors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Gay_pornography

The objector here earnestly and repeatedly compares the words "gay
pornographic" in *text* on the page to images of child pornography.


- d.