[Foundation-l] Controversial content software status

[MZMcBride]

MZMcBride wrote:
> Kat: Thank you for weighing in. I know many people appreciated hearing from
> you, Phoebe, and some of the other "big" voices who have commented here. And
> I think some of the replies in this thread have gone a long way to helping
> ease some tensions and create better dialogue. :-)
> 
> Andreas: I think 
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2012-March/072463.html is
> one of my favorite posts to foundation-l ever. I'll go add these examples to
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Controversial_content/Problems> now.

Sorry for double-posting, I forgot one more thing. There's been a bit of
discussion on Wikipedia Review about this topic, for anyone interested:

* http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37054

Larry Sanger also weighed in on his blog:

* http://larrysanger.org/2012/03/wikipedias-porn-filter-doa-and-a-proposal/

MZMcBride