[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

[Samuel Klein]

Hello Dominic,

A draft of the AffCom charter and plan have been shared with the
Board; I believe a final draft will be shared (and then published?)
within the week.  It is on the agenda for the Board's July meeting.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_meetings/July_11,_2012

AffCom is not taking on recognition of partners, at least initially
(as indicated in the same resolution you quote).  Right now the
Foundation and Chapters have separate processes for forming
partnerships and recognizing those partners.  It was suggested that a
WMF staff member oversee the process for recognizing partners, but
that remains to be finalized and aligned with existing process.

SJ

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
<mcdevitd at gmail.com> wrote:
> The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
> proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June, for
> approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
> Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization application,
> and that there is a preliminary process in place for that and the user
> groups (along with the pre-existing chapter process), but what about
> movement partners?
>
> Dominic
>
> On 21 June 2012 11:06, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Bence Damokos <bdamokos at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
>> Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
>> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
>> types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
>> depend on the requirements and definition we use.
>>
>> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
>> I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
>> conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
>> from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
>> is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
>> to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
>> and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
>> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
>> be appreciated, as well)
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Best,
>> Bence
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l



-- 
Samuel Klein          identi.ca:sj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266