[Wikimedia-l] Who invoked "principle of least surprise" for the image filter?

[Tobias Oelgarte]

Am 21.06.2012 22:24, schrieb Anthony:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Andreas Kolbe<jayen466 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Well, Todd has certainly said on-wiki in the past that he would not see a
>> problem in Wikipedia using a video of rape to illustrate an article on the
>> topic, provided it were appropriately licensed and did not raise privacy
>> concerns (for example if the persons shown were no longer alive).
> So would the same argument would apply to child porn, if the child is
> dead, and if it weren't illegal?
>
> The current situation seems to be that photos of child abuse are legal
> (and are allowed on Wikipedia), and photos of sexual abuse are legal
> (and are allowed on Wikipedia), but photos of child sexual abuse are
> illegal (and aren't on Wikipedia except for a few disputed cases).
>
Can you point me to any examples of real "child abuse", "sexual abuse" 
or of "child sexual abuse"?