[Wikimedia-l] Why is not free?

Nathan nawrich at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 21:51:42 UTC 2012

Think of a logo or a trademark as an identity; the arguments for releasing
free informational content are totally separate from allowing others to
make free use of your (or WMFs) identity. You might as well ask why not
release your name for any possible commercial use. I suspect you wouldn't
agree to do that.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argenton at gmail.com> wrote:

> So in your view, free images can be harmful? So why would I release a
> picture?
> And you're telling me is more important to believe in the logo, instead of
> checking the validity of what you are consuming? But we do not talk to our
> volunteers always check the sources and not to believe blindly in a single
> source?
> --
> Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> rodrigo.argenton at gmail.com
> +55 11 7971-8884
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list