[Foundation-l] Politico: "Wikimedia foundation hires lobbyists on sopa, pipa"
thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sun Jan 22 23:00:45 UTC 2012
On 22 January 2012 22:54, Mike Godwin <mnemonic at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's a massive selection bias there! Of course the NGOs that do
>> lots of lobbying think lobbying is a great idea, otherwise they
>> wouldn't be doing it.
> Not only that, but of course people who eat food and drink water to
> sustain themselves are unlikely to give proper weight to Breatharian
> points of view!
> That pesky POV problem keeps rearing its noisy head wherever you look. ;)
Indeed. That's why I asked for independent research. Research from
NGOs that have chosen not to engage in lobbying would be just as
> I welcome your independent research project when you get it started.
> Or anybody's, really. I suppose the null hypothesis is that one can
> simply stay silent and wins the issue anyway. Obviously, I tend to
> fall on the Gandhi/Martin Luther King side of that issue -- at least
> I'm transparent about my biases.
I disagree - the null hypothesis is that the gain from lobbying isn't
worth the cost, not that the gain is zero. (Cost includes far more
than just monetary cost, of course.)
More information about the wikimedia-l