[Foundation-l] Politico: "Wikimedia foundation hires lobbyists on sopa, pipa"
gregory.varnum at gmail.com
Sun Jan 22 19:24:23 UTC 2012
Basically a charity in the USA can spend up to 20% of its expenses on "direct lobbying" of related issues. Basically that means they can say "this is good and that's good" - but they can't actually endorse a party or individual. They can educate on that person - "so and so wants to do this" - but they can't then so "so vote for ABC instead" or anything along those lines. It can get a little trick if an org speaks on an issue that is in no way connected to their mission - but SOPA/PIPA and just about any technology related legislation falls within WMF's mission.
Essentially on SOPA/PIPA - this is absolutely within US law and it seems incredibly unlikely given WMF's budget that any of these expenses would ever come close to 20%. :)
-greg aka varnent
On Jan 22, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Gwern Branwen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm worried that we may be getting in trouble.
>> I don't know about US laws, but are charitable organizations allowed
>> to meddle in political lobbying?
>> I'd appreciate if more knowledgeable people could give us some light.
> It's perfectly allowed, and we're allowed to take positions on
> specific bills - it is just that lobbying cannot be a 'substantial
> part' of the WMF's activities unless it switches its charity type.
> (Googling around, I was reading
> and http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicp97.pdf )
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the wikimedia-l