[Foundation-l] Movement roles letter, Feb 2012

[Ilario Valdelli]

You have not understood the difference between a discussion in Meta
and the transformation of this discussion in an "operational"
implementation in the organization.

This proposal has a lot of "bugs", it seems like a discussion made in
front of the coffee machine.

Formally your point of view is acceptable, but this solution cannot be
implemented "as is" because your point of view remains hard to
implement.

I would be an inmate instead of a participant in "Pindaric flights".

Ilario

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Joan Goma <jrgoma at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> It is not a problem of lack of time or lack of communication channels. It
> is a problem of lack of participation of chapters and fear of change.
>
> These proposals have been in meta for months. [1] The answer to many of the
> questions raised here have been in meta for months. [2]
>
> The problem is that it is very difficult to reform a cemetery if you need
> the participation of inmates and even more if when you're about to decide
> then all of them suddenly resurrect to oppose.
>