[Wikimedia-l] fundraising status?
James Salsman
jsalsman at gmail.com
Tue Dec 25 14:00:22 UTC 2012
> Your posts are assuming a ridiculous degree of bad faith, where you
> you start from your own confusion and extrapolate downwards....
"we've stopped fundraising this year" -- December 21
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fundraising_2012&diff=4885494&oldid=4884949
"we're hoping to reach our US$25 million goal in the next few days" --
December 14
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2012-December/123043.html
Essentially equivalent comments have been made to me in private.
For those outside of the U.S.,
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Wikimedia-Foundation-Reviews-E38331.htm
(2.8, 55%) should resolve correctly. Because Glassdoor is susceptible
to sour grapes, it is probably best read in comparison to similar
nearby companies. For example:
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/WIKIA-Reviews-E428648.htm (4.5, 100%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Google-Reviews-E9079.htm (4.0, 90%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Facebook-Reviews-E40772.htm (4.6, 94%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Twitter-Reviews-E100569.htm (3.7, 56%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Apple-Reviews-E1138.htm (3.9, 82%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Oracle-Reviews-E1737.htm (3.2, 63%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Intuit-Reviews-E2293.htm (3.7, 79%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Adobe-Reviews-E1090.htm (3.7, 84%)
http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/VMware-Reviews-E12830.htm (3.3, 63%)
I hope the Board and leadership find some way to exceed the employee
satisfaction scores of at least one of those nine others in the coming
year.
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list