[Foundation-l] New Project Process
sjklein at hcs.harvard.edu
Tue Apr 3 20:22:37 UTC 2012
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We had started a stub table about this:
> This is brilliant! I've been after something like this for a while.
Thanks for the reminder, Nemo. I was looking for this on Meta, but
forgot to check the stratwiki.
Embarrassing, since apparently I started the page... :) Liam: another
reason to consider merging meta wikis.
> what would a WMF evaluation of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut down such
> a project... cease to mention it on Wikipedia main pages... or invest money in promoting it?
Good questions, subtle answers. Those are not the only options; we
might help them merge with a similar project. For instance,
wikieducator and wikiversity have almost identical missions, and might
benefit from being merged; the question of 'who hosts the site' is
relatively minor compared to the loss of splitting energy and focus
across two wikis.
> - "project review" : identify support each project expects from the WMF.
> - "easy improvements with high value". Start with Wiktionary
> - rename Commons to "WikiCommons"? merge WikiSpecies w/ WikiData?
> - merge Outreach, Strategy and MetaWiki --> wikimedia.org
> - lower barriers b/t wikis: global userpages, talk, watchlists
This whole class of brainstorming is important; making it less of a
pain to travel between projects is good for all of them.
> may be we could use the experience of langcom and appoint ten individuals
> who would recommend new proposals to the Board.
That's not a bad idea.
More information about the wikimedia-l