[Foundation-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Draft Terms of Use for Review

[Kudu]

I'd rather have harassment dealt with first by each community's AN/I
boards and ArbCom if necessary, and then the Global Requests Committee
or whatever it ends up being called. I don't think neither stewards
nor the WMF are in the proper position to make arbitrary calls over
user conduct. Stewards are meant to be for black and white cases.
Personally, I support the introduction of a global ban policy allowing
both for Committee and community bans.

~K

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> With or without that ToS, any sane ArbCom would block persons who
> harass others. But, we don't have a body which is able to do that
> globally. The first step is to get that body, then to make some things
> explicit.