[Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced

[dex2000 at pc.dk]

That's a property of any filter. But other filters may not fulfil the
requirement for protecting against accidential display of images.

Sir48/Thyge

----- Original meddelelse -----

> Fra: Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>
> Til: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Dato: Tor, 08. sep 2011 17:00
> Emne: Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced
> 
> No, that wouldn't/shouldn't still be possible. Any image can be made
> visible while the parents are away for some minutes. But as usual: No
> filter can replace the guidance trough parents. It's a parents job to
> explain their own kids how the world works.
> 
> Tobias Oelgarte
> 
> Am 08.09.2011 16:54, schrieb dex2000 at pc.dk:
> > and:
> > *the only solution to give parents a real possibility to protect
> their
> > kids against images on Wikipedia, which they consider inappropriate
> for
> > them.
> >
> > Sir48/Thyge
> >
> > ----- Original meddelelse -----
> >
> >> Fra: Tobias Oelgarte<tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>
> >> Til: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Dato: Tor, 08. sep 2011 16:40
> >> Emne: Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced
> >>
> >> This proposal was around for a long time inside the discussion
> pages
> >> of
> >> the referendum itself. It would have many positive arguments:
> >> * Truly neutral
> >> * Easy to implement
> >> * No time spend (lost) on sorting images
> >> * No editwars about categorization
> >>
> >> I would support this solution. But I'm strongly against any biased
> >> filtering by arbitrary categories.
> >>
> >> Tobias Oelgarte
> >>
> >> Am 08.09.2011 16:33, schrieb dex2000 at pc.dk:
> >>>
> >>>> --- On Wed, 7/9/11, David Gerard<dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> The closest we could come to a neutral filtering system is an
> >> easily
> >>>> accessible on/off switch for images.
> >>>> On Thursdy, 08. sep 2011 07:56 Andreas Kolbe jayen466 at yahoo.com
> >> [mailto:jayen466 at yahoo.com]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> Actually, that is really not a bad idea.
> >>>
> >>> +1. Actually, it's the best idea.
> >>>
> >>> Sir48/Thyge
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> foundation-l mailing list
> >>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >>> Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l