[Foundation-l] On curiosity, cats and scapegoats

[Béria Lima]

>
> *My boss (...) can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro
> is NSFW our workplace.
> *


I'm sorry but i don't find the problem in this article.

*I can't open the [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really
> in your face photo of a vagina when you open it up
> *


The article is about vagina. The only picture there who might be "NSFW" is
this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Azvag.jpg who only shows
what are the anatomy of a vagina. I find very educational.

And BTW, if you don't want to see a vagina, don't open the article.

*who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article,
> gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one!
> *


No it was not. There are in fact a category in commons (
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vagina ) and in that category i
found the image who replaced the Image you dislike so
much<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_vulva_with_visible_vaginal_opening.jpg>.
But not because you don't like, because the one in the article now is more
clear.
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.*


On 6 September 2011 15:15, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch at gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > Does your feminism excludes necessity for sexual education?
> >
> >
> No, but, I can send you some pictures on Commons that have been "speedy
> keeps" of strippers with their legs spread wide because they are
> "educational and high quality."
>
> My boss, who is bound to have a baby any day now, can't open the pregnancy
> article at work because the intro is NSFW our workplace. I can't open the
> [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really in your face photo
> of a vagina when you open it up, however, I can totally read the intro to
> [[penis]] since there isn't a big giant penis in one's face upon opening
> it.
> I work in an educational environment (a museum institution, which has
> exhibits on sexuality, gender, etc) and I can't even look at these articles
> at work, take that as you will.
>
> Sarah
> who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article,
> gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one!
>
> --
> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
> Foundation<http://www.glamwiki.org>
> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
> Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
> and
> Sarah Stierch Consulting
> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.sarahstierch.com/
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>