[Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced

[Béria Lima]

Blame the wording of the survey for not be clear enough?
_____
*Béria Lima*

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.*


On 4 September 2011 11:35, Mikael <mikael79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the other hand: "I think it is important not to..." isn't necessarily
> interpreted the same as "I think it is not important to...".
> Which of those answers was meant by the respondents that chose "0"?
>
> \Mike
>
> On 04/09 2011 11:17, David Gerard wrote:
> > On 4 September 2011 05:33, Philippe Beaudette<pbeaudette at wikimedia.org>
>  wrote:
> >
> >> The committee running the vote on the features for the Personal Image
> Filter
> >> have released their interim report and vote count.  You may see the
> results
> >> at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Results/en.
> >
> >
> > The bimodal distribution in the first graph suggests this feature will
> > continue to be controversial (to say the least), with fans saying "we
> > had the majority" and foes saying "there is clearly not a consensus".
> >
> > So. What happens now?
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>