[Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

[Bjoern Hoehrmann]

* Andreas K. wrote:
>I wasn't actually saying that à propos the image filter, more in relation to
>the general point about editorial judgment.
>
>Cultures differ, and like attracts like. You know our demographics. They're
>still far from ideal.
>
>* Half of our editors are 21 or younger.
>
>* Only a quarter are 30 or older, yet this is the demographic with the most
>expertise.

Per http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_Survey_2011/Profiles you seem
to be quite mistaken, only 27% are 21 or younger, and 47% are 30+. With
various statistical caveats that I haven't researched, and this is "us"
as in editors, I am not aware of a representative study of readers, and
they would count as editors when they get involved in editorial matters.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/