[Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

[Jussi-Ville Heiskanen]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Morton
<morton.thomas at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> As a person from a more nordic and perhaps even ruder than brazilian
>> culture, We did confront a teacher who was in her retirement age with
>> images worse than genital piercings. And, yes, she not only blushed
>> but turned livid, But she kept on teaching us biology. ! Not saying
>> what we did was right, as kids. Not saying she shouldn't have done
>> more to get the stuff from being thrown about. But there is a point
>> there about tolerances. If an elderly lady was able to keep teaching
>> while being bombarded with images of withered old female genitals
>> being inserted with electrical appliance cable stashing piping, why
>> can't wikipedia? I know this sounds totally offensive on the face of
>> it, but surely that is the whole point. Being against censorship only
>> matters when there is a potential outrage there...
>
>
> On Wikipedia this is called vandalism and trolling; and we *do* censor it :)
>

No we don't and that is the whole point. We edit. We don't censor,



-- 
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]