[Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

[???]

On 19/10/2011 18:17, Nathan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, ???<wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk>  wrote:
>> On 19/10/2011 15:24, Béria Lima wrote:
>>> problematic to who?
>>
>> Well obviously not problematic to someone with the empathic capacity
>> that would shame a tree stump.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You've been making several comments like this recently, and it's at
> the point where a moderator needs to step in to help you understand
> that your posts are inappropriate.
>

These posts are just as educational as some random articles on 
snowballing (sexual practice). They are also clearly labelled so one 
shouldn't have any problem ignoring them or not looking at them, and if 
one finds them objectionable or disagreeable to one's culture that is 
really a problem on the part of the reader, who needs to consider that 
others have a different cultural background that is not as cosseted as 
one's own.

Did I miss anything?