[Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

[Béria Lima]

problematic to who?
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.*


On 19 October 2011 15:22, <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> en.wp.st47 at gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:37 AM, ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > > So how many times is the button pressed each day? If it gets pressed 4
> > > million times a day, and there is only one porn page, then at least one
> > > person will have recieved porn. If there are 100 porn pages then 100
> > > people will receive porn each day.
> > >
> > > So how many porn pages and how many button presses per day?
> >
> > There are no porn pages. There are articles in an encyclopedia. What's
> > the problem here?
> >
>
> That there is a pornography project would be empirical evidence to the
> contrary. That a random page load can load pages with CBT images, genital
> piercings, or ejaculate leaking from or flowing over various body parts is
> also problematic.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>