[Foundation-l] Is random article truly random

[Lodewijk]

I would guess that the odds of arriving at such article are so low, that it
would not be worth the huge discussion it would definitely result into, to
make this change because there is barely any improvement. Have we ever
received complaints from people who arrived at such articles after pressing
the random article button?

Best,
lodewijk

No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae <fae at wikimedia.org.uk> escreveu:

> Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in mind articles such as
> [[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main
> thrust) or unstable articles that are currently locked due to
> edit-warring, blatant lobbying or similar.
>
> Cheers,
> Fae
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>