[Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 85, Issue 52

[Thomas Dalton]

On 26 April 2011 03:06,  <WJhonson at aol.com> wrote:
> I always thought that translations were considered "wholely derivative",
> that is that a new copyright is *not* created, by translating.

I would expect that to vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For
example, jurisdictions that includes some kind of "sweat of the brow"
doctrine would probably protect translations. What jurisdiction are
you referring to?