[Foundation-l] Legal requirements for sexual content -- help, please!

[Ray Saintonge]

wjhonson at aol.com wrote:
> Wouldn't it?  Unless you're going to support what appears to be an unsupportable platform that "child porn" (or whatever you want to call it) is somehow different from any other type of content such as snuff films or instructions on how to build a fertilizer bomb or detailed plans for the assassination a leading figure.
>
>   
How to build such a bomb would be perfectly legal information. Advice 
about how it might be deployed for illegal purposes would not. A 
perfectly legitimate use of such a device might be to blow up stumps on 
one's own farm.

Ec