[Foundation-l] Legal requirements for sexual content -- help, please!

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/22/2010 11:41:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk writes:


> <<The foundation or the site admins do moderate. The foundation or they 
> DO 
> have the power, to delete submissions that are considered  non 
> encyclopedic, trolling, libelous and etc. There is constant moderation 
> on by or on behalf of the foundation. If not teh Foundation then the 
> admins have responsibility. The foundation is not acting simply as a 
> hosting site that merely stores user submitted data. It is not godaddy, 
> it is not wordpress, it is not even YouTube.>>

*Any* user has the ability to delete content.
Is any user now "the foundation" ?
That's not an effective argument for the responsibility lying at the top, 
in fact you've just made the complete opposite argument.